Saturday, July 25, 2009

A Necessary Deep Examination of Barack Obama

I have been thinking about the man who resides in the Oval Office of the White House since I read the health care legislation that this man wants to force the American people to use for themselves and their families. Frankly, I got chills down my spine when I read that bill.

I'm not a naive person. I knew the man was evil and I know he has surrounded himself with very evil people. Jesus said, "Ye shall know them by their fruits..." and we certainly see what type of fruit Obama has produced in his life.

I'm not going to write about the healthcare bill. I don't know how many, if any, read this blog. But it helps get the frustration out of my mind. It's been a constant fight day after day since he took office. He has made lobbyists out of every one of us who care about our country, the future of our children and who just refuse to sit idly by and watch it all go to hell.

We don't even know who this man is. That is very scary. I want to investigate this man here by what we DO know and what we DO NOT know.

We know who has has been associated with in his past. A telling thing about Obama is how many aliases he has had. Sure, I have what might be considered "aliases". I used my middle name for my business and my first name is what my family members call me. So, you could say I have an alias. So what?

So let us delve deeply into what we can find about WHO Barack Hussein Obama is. If you read my previous blog you know that I believed the day AFTER the election that he is a sociopath. One characteristic of sociopaths is that they have the ability to "recreate" themselves. Certainly, Obama has done this and is hiding something BIG in his past. And he has many accomplices.

BHO’s autobiography, in light of the foregoing revelations, is another fraud being perpetrated on the whole world. How could he be so wrong about so many "facts" in his personal life and historical accounts of his ancestral "roots?"

To date, BHO has been unable to produce a valid birth certificate. The "Certificate of Live Birth" from the state of Hawaii he produced for his presidential campaign has been determined to be "a horrible forgery" that lacks the proper state seal, signatures, certification number and contains several other anomalies that cast serious doubt on the authenticity of the document. BHO cannot, therefore, prove August 4, 1961, as his date of birth nor the state of Hawaii as his birthplace. So where—and when—was he born?

Genetic traits. One might find several clues in BHO’s appearance. BHO may resemble his "mother" or "father" if one stretches his imagination but there are aspects of his physical appearance that call his parentage into question.

Americans are familiar with the progression of numerous black generations who first arrived as slaves. Some interbred with whites, Hispanics, or other races with lighter skin, though they continued to produce offspring with dark complexions. Black genes are dominant and typically several interracial encounters are required before lighter-skinned offspring are produced.

BHO’s complexion does appear to be unusually light, considering he is "the first offspring" produced between a black man and a white woman. As "politically incorrect" as it may be, this is a scientifically valid observation. BHO’s "parents" were also of average or below-average height though he turned out to be over six feet tall.

That BHO turned out to be so tall and light-skinned, considering his alleged parentage and alleged grandparentage is, genetically speaking, curious.

One characteristic which cannot be attributed to his black Kenyan "father" or his white American "mother" is the color of his lips. BHO carries a trait unique to those born in southeast Asia, certain parts of the Middle East and northern Africa and is only visible in color photos and videos. Obama’s lips have a purple hue common to those born in the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia and in some Arab countries. It is a feature not found in black Africans, nor in African-Americans, yet BHO has it (Recall that the "Obama" name is also of Indonesian origin).

The Indonesia years? Considering the "Obama" name is Maluku in origin and his physical traits, BHO was likely born in Papua, New Guinea—not Hawaii. South Molucca, like the greater part of Indonesia, had been under Dutch control for centuries. Larry Martin, an "expatriate" who has lived in Southeast Asia for more than 20 years, published an article on January 20, 2007, at his Internet blog site:, "An American Expat in Southeast Asia." Martin's article, "Tracking Down Obama in Indonesia," quotes the findings of "Detikcom," an international online news source:

During this short period of time [when Obama was supposed to have lived in Indonesia (1967-71 or 1968-73) depending on who's telling the story], Barack was believed to have lived in a house on Dempo Street near Amir Hamzah Park and the city center of Jakarta. However, currently the occupants of the house and the residents in this area have never heard of either Barack or Barry.

Tracking down the past of [a] U.S. senator in Indonesia is quite difficult. The only quite strong information Detikcom was able to obtain was from a[n] Onny Padmo, Barry’s classmate in class 4 of Besuki primary school, Menteng, Jakarta near the city center around 1971.

Onny admitted to attending Barry’s birthday party at his house at that time. Barry’s house was supposedly on Dempo Street near Amir Hamzah Park. But, Onny didn’t quite seem to remember the exact address. As you know, that was over 35 years ago.

Detikcom investigated the area on Monday (3/7/2006). However, several residents who have lived in this area for quite a long time had never heard of the Barack name or Barry. They had also never heard of the Lolo Soetoro name, Ann Dunham, or Maya Kassandra Soetoro.

In fact Barry, together with his mother and his stepfather, lived in Indonesia for quite a long time. Apparently Barry went to Primary School here for only one year in Primary 4, but the information from Maya Soetoro is that Barry had lived in Indonesia between the years of 1968-1973. However, the exact location of Barry’s house for five years remains unclear.

"The only thing that is certain," according to Onny, "is that ‘Barry’ lived on Dempo Street."

"I had previously attended Barry’s birthday party in the house, not far from Amir Hamzah Park," said Onny, Barry’s school friend from 1971.

At the time, Dempo Street was still being worked on. It was just off Amir Hamzah Park although not right in front. The road closer to the mosque at that time was quite famous. One of the residents who had lived a long time in the Amir Hamzah Park are, Ari (aged 55), when being questioned by Detikcom, claimed to have never heard of a Barack, Obama, or Barry. He had also never heard of a person named Lolo Soetoro. "As I remember in the 1960s many Dutch lived near this area. If there was a Negroid child, I would have known," said Ari, who added, "Apart from Dutch, though, in this area there also lived many descendents of the Dutch Ambonese."

Haji Mamiati, who had lived in the area since the 1950s also admitted to not knowing of an Ann Dunham, Lolo Soetoro or Barry. He claimed that in the Amir Mamzah Park area, during the 1960s there were many foreigners. Mamiati thought that he had indeed seen a black negro child who had curly hair who lived in No. 2 Dempo Street sometime around the 1970s. Hovever, he said the negroid child was claimed to have been from Papua. "Indeed there was a negroid child, but they claimed that the child was from Irian [or West Papua, a province in eastern Indonesia]," said Maniati."

Obviously, the residents of Jakarta did not recall the "Soetoro family," nor Barack Obama. The evidence suggests that if Obama was in Indonesia for any length of time, it was for a birthday party at a house no one can find today and for only part of one school year.

Maya Soetoro, BHO’s half sister, is on record as claiming that BHO lived with Stanley Ann and Soetoro in Indonesia from 1968 to 1973 and that he lived there from 1968-1974. We now have BHO living in Indonesia from either 1967-1971; 1967-1972; 1968-1973 and; 1968-1974.

Thus far we have established that there is no part of BHO’s life story from his alleged birth in 1961 until 1971 (or 1972, 1973 and 1974) that can be proved through documents or anecdotes.

The vagaries continue. Like Barack Obama, Sr., BHO’s education was beyond his family’s visible financial means, so who paid for it? Most likely, the Rockefellers. They could have easily funneled his tuition into a Bank of Hawaii account set up by its VP, Madelyn Dunham, BHO’s maternal grandmother (Remember that Madelyn Dunham’s father worked for the Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Co).

College years. The official story states that BHO began his college career at Occidental College in Los Angeles. Why would young BHO choose to attend classes at Occidental? Why wouldn’t BHO enroll at the University of Hawaii where both of his alleged parents were "alumni" and where he had lived (since the Christmas holidays in 1971) when he returned to Hawaii with his mother to live with his grandparents (Stanley Armour and Madelyn Dunham) until graduating high school?

Occidental is known as a liberal arts college, ranking 36th nationally in 2008 and having a "rising star quality," the same phraseology used by the media when describing Obama’s sudden "rise in popularity" and his "star-like qualities." Occidental also sponsors student foreign-exchange programs affiliated with the UN. BHO likely did not choose Occidental; Occidental was chosen for him.

After two years at Occidental, BHO transferred to Columbia University in New York and graduated in 1983 with a BA in Political Science, concentrating in "International Relations." Despite having previously received "scholarships" and "financial aid from his grandparents," Obama spent his first night in New York "sleeping in an alley near the corner of 109th and Amsterdam Avenue" and "washing with the homeless next to an open fire hydrant," according to, the Columbia University "wiki encyclopedia."

Also according to, BHO chose not to live on campus, moving "into a walkup on E. 94th St., in East Harlem, where he would "chat with his Puerto Rican neighbors about...the sound of gunfire at night.

"Obama's professors and classmates, including former international politics professor Michael Baron and current MTV president Michael Wolf, confirm that he was a brilliant, standout student and that he was an active participant in seminars. Baron said he was one of the top one or two students in his class.

"Despite this, Obama continually declines requests to release his Columbia transcript."

Though there has been significant discussion as to whether Obama's senior thesis was about "Soviet nuclear disarmament" or the "North-South debate on trade and the new international economic order," he did not write an official thesis at all. The paper, written for Professor Baron's American Foreign Policy class, was only a "long seminar paper." Baron "claims to have lost his copy of the paper in a move sometime ago."

And though BHO has written about "racial slurs" inscribed on campus walls and bathroom stalls at Columbia University, former students do not recall seeing them, nor do they recall seeing BHO. Perhaps Zbigniew Brzezinski, former Columbia University Professor from 1960-1989—and BHO’s current foreign policy advisor—could shed some light on both issues.

After leaving Columbia in 1983, BHO remained in New York for four years then moved to Chicago. During his New York and Chicago years, BHO was predominately employed by a succession of community action organizations until he began attending Harvard Law School in 1988 and was elected the first "black" president of the Harvard Law Review in 1990. BHO graduated magna cum laude with a Harvard law degree in 1991.

On a more dubious note, Obama also became adept at collecting parking tickets in Somerville, MA. BHO avoided paying the fines for over 19 years. They were only paid in 2007 after he announced his candidacy to run for president.

According to George P. Hassett, Senior Editor of the Somerville News, "Before Barack Obama was a United States senator and a presidential hopeful, he was a Harvard University law student living in Somerville who parked in bus stops and accumulated hundreds of dollars in parking tickets. And, for nearly two decades, those parking tickets went unpaid until a representative of Obama’s settled all his outstanding debts with Cambridge’s Traffic, Parking and Transportation Department Jan. 26 [2007]…"

During his time at Harvard, BHO lived at 366 Broadway in Somerville, according to his parking tickets. Records from the Cambridge Traffic, Parking and Transportation office show that between Oct. 5, 1988 and Jan. 12, 1990, BHO was cited for 17 traffic violations, sometimes receiving two in the same day. The violations included parking in a resident permit area, parking in a bus stop and failing to pay the meter. Twelve of BHO’s 17 tickets were given to him on Massachusetts Avenue. In one eight-day stretch in 1988, BHO was cited seven times for parking violations and was fined $45. Thirteen of the 17 violations occurred within one month in 1988.

BHO’s disobedience of the rules of the road earned him $140 in fines from the City of Cambridge. The tickets went unpaid for over 19 years and $260 in late fees were added to the tab. On Jan. 26. the fines and late fees were paid in full. The final tally for Obama’s parking breaches was $400, according to Cambridge Traffic, Parking and Transportation.

Obama spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki said the presidential candidate’s parking violations were not relevant. "He didn’t owe that much and what he did owe, he paid…Many people have parking tickets and late fees. All the parking tickets were paid in full," Psaki said.

Most ordinary Americans are treated differently when parking tickets are not paid. The collection process commonly results in "offenders" being tracked down and forced to pay outstanding traffic tickets, including court costs; nonpayment of parking tickets can also result in suspension of driving "privileges," jail, wage garnishments, liens and/or foreclosures on real property. Why was BHO allowed to avoid paying those fines for more than 19 years despite his notoriety as a U.S. senator? What gives him immunity from the very laws he helps create?

Substance abuse and allegations of homosexuality. There is little disclosure, if any, by the media about BHO’s substance abuse issues, though he has admitted using marijuana and cocaine while in college. The website even states in reference to BHO’s two years at Occidental, "… Obama had been into partying and drugs" and that he hoped the move to New York and Columbia would "…put him on a more serious track."

Claims that BHO is currently a substance-abusing homosexual surfaced in March, 2008. Larry Sinclair, an open homosexual, claims that he met BHO in 1999 at an Illinois nightclub, drank Scotch with BHO and snorted cocaine while "Obama smoked crack cocaine" and engaged in sex with the then Illinois state senator in the back of a "Five Star" limousine. According to Sinclair, the limousine driver introduced him to BHO.

Sinclair disavowed knowing that BHO was a political figure at the time and related another encounter when BHO appeared at Sinclair’s Comfort Inn and Suites, Gurnee, IL hotel room on November 6th and 7th, 1999, drugs in tow. On this occasion, Sinclair claimed he not only engaged in sexual relations with Obama, but with his limousine driver as well.

Murder at TUCC. Sinclair’s allegations are supported by a series of events that took place at Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ (TUCC).

On Dec. 23, 2007, Donald Young died from multiple gunshot wounds, including at least one delivered "execution style" to the back of his head. Young was the openly gay, ordained deacon, church officer and music director at TUCC—the church BHO had attended for many years.

Sinclair claims that Young had a similar relationship to BHO and that Young had likely communicated his "jealous displeasure" about BHO's fling with Sinclair and paid for it with his life. Sinclair also charges that Obama gave Young his phone numbers to inquire if Sinclair revealed these secrets to anyone else.

Coincidentally, another openly-gay member of the church, Larry Bland, had been found shot to death in his home a month earlier, on November 17, 2007 at 8:40 a.m. The Chicago Police Department is currently investigating both deaths as murder cases.

Nate Spencer, a third homosexual TUCC congregant, was pronounced dead of "natural causes," on December 26, 2007 at 6:31 a.m. The "natural causes" noted on a copy of the death certificate published online by Sinclair were "septicemia, pneumonia, and HIV."

Rumors abound that Spencer's death was also due to gunshot wounds to the back of the head. However, Sinclair maintains that those rumors are untrue and offered the above-mentioned death certificate as proof.

Sinclair has also raised an extremely important question: "How is it that the Reverend Jeremiah Wright knew of Donald Young's death before it was officially declared by the medical examiner at 12:10 p.m. that Sunday afternoon?"

Members of the TUCC congregation report that they first learned that Young had been killed when Wright announced the death to the congregation(s) at either (or both) the 7:30 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. Sunday services, prior to Young having been officially declared dead.

On May 31, 2008, BHO left the church he claims to have attended for "more than 20 years."

National Press Club. In a June 18, 2008 press conference before the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., Sinclair fielded questions about his allegations and admitted that he had served prison sentences for committing fraud. At the conclusion of the conference, Sinclair was taken into custody by Washington, D.C., police executing "outstanding arrest warrants" from Colorado and Delaware.

Truth or consequences. It was obvious to those who had been following Sinclair’s Internet blog and radio interviews that he was causing major damage to BHO’s campaign and had to be stopped. On all accounts, Sinclair appears to be steadfast in his appeal that BHO "finally come clean and tell the truth."

Reverse speech analysis of Larry Sinclair’s numerous sound bites, both from radio interviews and the press conference, show that he is being truthful. The new science has demonstrated instances where politicians (and those under criminal indictment) have lied. Though this emerging technology is still controversial, reverse speech analysis has been demonstrated to be more revealing than the standard polygraph tests administered by law enforcement agencies across the country. Sinclair even accuses Obama of "arranging a rigged polygraph examination" intended to discredit him.

Larry Sinclair also charges that there exists a link between Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden's false charges against him (for which he was arrested and then exonerated) and the subsequent selection of his father, Senator Joseph Biden, as BHO's vice-presidential running mate. One good turn deserves another.

Chicago Tribune. Sinclair’s charges of recent BHO drug use are further supported by public disclosures that BHO’s former high school friend, Keith Kakugawa, a convicted drug felon, contacted his campaign headquarters, implying he needed cash. BHO, according to Kakugawa's interview with The Chicago Tribune, March 29, 2008, urged his "old friend" to avoid publicity by asserting, "Hey, I'd rather you not talk to reporters."

It is assumed that someone in the Obama campaign likely arranged the funds necessary to encourage his silence, though campaign officials admit they only "offered to call social service agencies" on Kakugawa's behalf. Kakugawa's criminal record includes multiple (four) convictions for possession of cocaine, two for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and auto theft. In the interview, Kakugawa denied that he attempted to extort money from the Obama campaign.

Rev. Jeremiah Wright. As these alarming developments were unfolding, the mainstream media diverted America’s attention on the Rev. Jeremiah Wright of Chicago’s 10,000-member TUCC "megachurch." Wright’s controversial sermons about whites, HIV/Aids and the "plight of unwed mothers" were all over the news last March. While these are all valid issues, the media "spun" them out of context. By loudly directing America’s attention to Rev. Wright, who had little or nothing to do with BHO’s campaign, quieter claims of BHO’s drug abuse, homosexuality and homicide by Sinclair and others were effectively silenced.

Wright retired in Feb., 2008, at age 66 after 36 years as the pastor at TUCC.

BHO’s attendance at TUCC. BHO claims (in his 2006 autobiography "The Audacity of Hope") that he "joined Trinity United Church of Christ because he did not necessarily have to be a believer." He claimed he was baptized shortly before his 30th birthday, or sometime in 1991-92 and that he had attended the church for "over 20 years" by the time he stopped attending on May 31, 2008.

Ayana Karanja, Ph.D., a professor of anthropology and sociology and director of the Black World Studies Department at Loyola University, Chicago, claims she was an established member of TUCC when Obama joined the church in 1985. Other accounts state that BHO joined TUCC after moving to Chicago in 1987. BHO claims he began attending TUCC in 1988 and was formally baptized into the church shortly before his 30th birthday in 1991.Which account is accurate?

Aliases. Since other members of the "Dunham-Obama" clan have aliases, the author assumed BHO has them, too. While querying "Barack Obama" in various people search databases on the Internet, one can easily find BHO’s addresses and phone numbers. However, in one obscure, yet phenomenally "insightful" database, there are no records for BHO (additional queries show that the names and records of many controversial public officials are also conspicuously absent). Suspecting a coverup, I began querying names associated with BHO. When the name "David Obama" was queried, it was like hitting the alias jackpot. "David Obama," was BHO’s alleged younger half-brother who reportedly "died in a motorcycle accident in 1987," before BHO had the opportunity to meet him.

The story is contradicted by Kezia, who casually mentioned Barack's "1985 visit to Kenya" in her Mail Online interview—yet another anomaly in BHO's justifiably disputable chronology of life events.

Davad [Edjoa] Obama’s name, at least, lives on.

Under David Obama comes the list of possible aliases: David O. Edjoa, David Edlavitch, David E. Obama and David Obama-Edjoa.

A Google search on David Edlavitch reveals a realtor named "David A. Edlavitch" who lives in Maryland and works as a foreclosure and post-sale agent for Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC, a law firm that specializes in providing "…legal representation in Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia to mortgage lenders, mortgage servicers, banks and other financial institutions."

Among those listed as possible relatives and associates are Edjoa D. Obama, Joseph Bama, Mildred Bama, Jana Hallman Bama, Josepha Edjoaeyombo and Paul N. Bama.

Upon running the names above through the same database we discover a bottomless rabbit hole that begins with BHO’s long-dead half-brother. We also discover that, among the names of possible aliases, relatives and associates, the only name that does not cross reference back to the other names is "David Obama." This is a very strange anomaly since the entire search began by querying David Obama.

Down the rabbit hole. Recall that the "Obama" name was derived from two words, "O" and "Bama" in the Maluku language of New Guinea. The "Bama" names appearing as possible aliases/relatives and associates are an interesting jumble of names arising from the original query of David Obama. When one starts following leads associated with these names, it’s "back down the rabbit hole we go."

For instance, "Paul N. Bama (PNB)" and "Maxine D. Francis (MDF)" are co-owners of a house at 3432 Canberra St., Silver Spring, MD. The house was purchased in January or February, 2005, from "David Oliyide and C. Oliyide" for $390,000. "David Oliyide-Bailey," (his full name) is an employee of Potomac Electrical Power Company (Pepco) and C. Oliyide (Christina A.) is a graduate of M.I.T. No crime here, but why the obfuscation of their real names on the property titles?

PNB and MDF do not live at the Canberra St. house; it was, as of June, 2008, rented to a woman named "Raquel Jennings."

According to, an Internet blog site where photographers and models discuss portfolios, screen tests, nude modeling, and "breaking into the modeling business," the bloggers were suspicious of a company called "Classic Modeling Agency" which charged aspiring models $149 to publish their "portfolios" on the Internet—something anyone could do for free (or a small fee)—and has not fulfilled web certification requirements.

In her own post, "Raquel" solicited photographers and models for "Classic Modeling Agency." The email address that once accompanied her post, "" has suddenly disappeared.

Not only was "Raquel’s" email address abandoned, but her telephone number was recently disconnected. The house is still lived in and now has a "new" tenant and a new phone number for a "Carol R. Jennings."

Searches reveal that Carol either works for an Internet Hosting company, Third Party Software Systems, Inc., of Silver Spring, MD, or as an attorney for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)—or both.

The registrant of Classic Modeling Agency’s web site URL, "" is a web site graphic designer with addresses in Columbus, OH and Chicago, IL. The designer’s own web page leads one back into a maze of doctors, medical clinics and other ventures, returning to more aliases, more properties and more obfuscation.

Another posting from "Nick Soren" the "president" of Classic Modeling Agency promised to file a lawsuit against the bloggers at the ModelMayhem site.

The name "Nick Soren" is also fictitious. His real name is "Soren Hansen," age 26, who lives in Nørresundby, Denmark and his Internet Relay Chat (IRC) name is "Nick: soren." Hansen, as his alter-ego "Soren," describes himself "as a 42-year-old man with a wife of 22 years and two daughters who surf the Internet frequently...."

Hansen is featured on several sites as an Ubuntu Core Developer "working on ebox and Ubuntu Server."

Taking offense to a blogger’s remark that the owner of Classic Modeling Agency might be "a horny guy in his apartment," Hansen suggests, "The slightest research or a quick e-mail or phone call to any of my staff would have made clear.…that our culture is completely at odds with the image painted by that remark."

The author did attempt to call and email Raquel Jennings, but both her email and phone number were expired, as was "Nick Soren’s" Classic Modeling Agency web site.

So, we now have two individuals, "Raquel Jennings" (aka Carol R. Jennings) and "Nick Soren" (aka Soren Hansen) affiliated with Classic Modeling Agency, which appears to have been a scam operated, at least in part, out of the home owned by "Paul A. Bama" and "Maxine D. Francis." To further complicate matters, Google the name "Maxine Franas" (a Maxine D. Francis alias) and see what happens. Google will ask, "Did you mean Maxine Francis?"

How (or why) would Google associate the Franas alias to the Francis name?

Paul N. Bama and Maxine D. Francis own other properties in the Silver Spring and Hyattsville, MD areas, each having disconnected phone numbers and current tenants with African, Arabic, Israeli, and Hispanic names. One of those addresses even houses an ambulatory service company which operates in Washington, D.C.

Following these names/aliases leads to another labyrinth of medical clinics, hospitals, fast-food franchises, medical suppliers and pharmaceutical companies.

It appears from the records that "Maxine D. Francis" alternately uses middle initials "A.," and "B," which reveal some interesting real estate holdings in Miami, Florida, including houses, apartment complexes, office buildings, and food service/manufacturing companies.

Returning to Paul N. Bama’s "relative/associates" list we find that the sheer number of addresses, relatives and associates to be staggering. Previous locations for Paul N. Bama include references to 99 in Carrboro, NC, 32 in Hillsborough, NC, 10 in Chapel Hill, NC, 10 in Mocksville, NC, 5 in Winston Salem, NC; 28 more locations are indicated in 19 other cities. Simple arithmetic reveals a staggering total of 184 addresses, 159 relatives and 386 phone numbers under one alias which connects repeatedly to thousands of other aliases, over and over again—all of which began by querying the name "David Obama."

And in one more attempt to muddy the waters of obfuscation, Paul N. Bama authored a solitary blog post on an Internet news site, "Topix," (, entry #180 on page 9, in response to this headline on July 19, 2007:

U.S. Marine convicted in Iraqi grandfather's death

SAN DIEGO - A military jury found a U.S. Marine guilty on Wednesday for conspiring to kidnap and kill an Iraqi grandfather nabbed from his home and shot dead in the middle of the night last year. Cpl. Trent ...

"For anyone who has served we know what this is. After every incident an investigation must be conducted. This is a case of some stupid, punk, JAG kid, fresh out of college trying to make a name for himself and get promoted. As always at the expense of someone who would be responsible for saving his ass if he were actually in country. What can be done the troops are damned if they do and damned if they don't. Bush is an idiot but you can blame him he was born that way; congress is at fault for letting him steal the first election." ... Paul N. Bama, Greenville, AL

Paul N. Bama is not listed anywhere on any database as living in "Greenville, AL," though this occasion served as an opportunity to blend a political statement with a little "male bonding." The web site seems to be frequented exclusively by men.

Renee L. Abena Obama. The most shocking discovery about BHO was hidden within David Obama’s "relatives" list and it casts a very, very dark occultic shadow on BHO. The name "Renee Abena Obama" appeared. Who is Renee Abena Obama? Actually, the proper question is, "Who was Renee L. Abena Obama?"

An exhaustive search revealed the birth of a baby girl named Renee L. Abena Obama on October 31, 2004. The infant died less than two months later on December 25, 2004.

Young infants frequently die from congenital complications, though the death was not reported by any hospital in the State of Maryland, but by a funeral home (indicated by the SSDI code: 72).

BHO’s biographies do not report the death of an infant in 2004, yet here was a baby girl who bore his last name—and the initial of his grandmother’s middle name—Madelyn "Lee" Dunham. A search of the Social Security Death Index produced "No Results," though a genealogical index at produced a Social Security number: "215-71-0752."

Entering the number directly into a search revealed its owner:

Name: Renee L Abena Obama

Birth Date: 31 October 2004 (Historical Events)

Death Date: 25 December 2004 (Historical Events)

Issuing State: Maryland

SSN: 215-71-0752

A subsequent review of birth and death dates of the Dunham family revealed a startling coincidence—Ralph Waldo Emerson Dunham (BHO’s maternal great-grandfather) was born on December 25, 1894—exactly 110 years before Renee’s death.

Renee was born under strange circumstances. Her death at age two months was strangely reported with almost no details memorialized in the public record. Therefore, we have the "authority" to speculate on the significance of Baby Renee L. Abena Obama’s short life.

The Illuminati has a penchant for Satanic rituals with numerological significance. The 110-year time period represents the number "11," a powerfully mystical number symbolizing "one greater than God." In short, Dunham’s birth December 25, 1894, marked the beginning and Renee’s Dec. 25, 2004 death marked the end. Renee Obama also lived a total of 56 days. Adding (5+6) produces another "11."

This baby’s death had all the earmarks of a Satanic sacrifice. That day could have marked Barack Obama’s full submission to the authority of the Illuminati.

There were no significant worldwide events on October 31, 2004, other than the modern celebration of the pagan "All Hallows Eve." Of course, December 25th represents the pagan birthdate celebration of Christ, so that date (the number of days the baby lived and Dunham’s birthday) were all occultically significant.

The following day, December 26, 2004, was a significant day for the whole world. A tsunami struck Indonesia, killing 146,000 people. The numerology on this published death toll is, again, "11" (1+4+6). The "11:11" derived from the two sequential events (the ritual sacrifice of a 2-month-old baby and the 146,000 victims of the tsunami) also symbolizes a new beginning.

Renee L. Abena Obama’s death should also mark the beginning of another event—a murder investigation.

BHO and Kenyan politics. BHO and an email from two American missionaries who spent 12 years in Kenya details Obama’s role in funding Raila Amollo Odinga’s attempted overthrow of the Kenyan government. BHO’s second middle name,"Muhammed," is revealed, along with his $1 million "contribution" to Odinga’s campaign. In August, 2006, BHO toured Kenya and spoke in favor of Odinga’s candidacy at several rallies.

The missionaries report that escalated violence (promoted by Odinga’s methods) resulted in the deaths of "hundreds of thousands" of Kenyans.

Odinga, like so many other politicians around the world, claims he is a cousin of BHO. Odinga’s "election" as prime minister is being challenged, though he, himself, is charging "fraud."

BHO and organized crime. Though the local Chicago media covered Barack Obama’s ties to organized crime, particularly in the case of Syrian-born real estate developer Antoin "Tony" Rezko’s $1.6 million payment for the lot adjacent to Obama’s new $2 million home, Obama has been able to hide his corrupt financial interests, his ties to the UN, UNESCO, the FAO, the CFR, the CIA, the Israeli Mossad, APEC/ABAC, and their interests in the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, and "Non-Wood Forestry Products."

The author has discovered the truth about Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama and his cohorts, and has been notified that he is being "stalked" by UNESCO, through its La Habra, California IP address: 4.131.135./# (Level 3 Communications). The IP address leads to another organization, DATAMAT, with a head office that appears to be in Rome, Italy. Google the IP address for some interesting financial statements.

Obama's Wife Michelle Put on Disciplinary Action by Supreme Court of Illinois


What Is the ARDC? (this is NOT the Illinois Bar-where one can voluntarily be inactive) As the name implies, the ARDC is the agency of the Supreme Court of Illinois which registers attorneys and investigates complaints of misconduct filed against attorneys holding a license to practice law in Illinois.

The principal purpose of this agency is to assist the Supreme Court to determine a lawyer's fitness to practice law in Illinois. If a complaint is made that an attorney, licensed to practice law in Illinois, has engaged in illegal, unethical or dishonest conduct, they will investigate and, if warranted, bring formal disciplinary charges. The Supreme Court of Illinois will then ultimately decide if a lawyer should be censured (publicly rebuked), suspended (having the law license to practice either taken away for a certain period of time or placed on a probationary period) or disbarred (having the law license taken away indefinitely).

More skeletons.................

Obama and Acorn

Acknowledging what the blogosphere had known for weeks, the New York Times finally went on record to admit that just before last Election Day it killed a politically sensitive news story involving corruption allegations that might have made the Obama campaign look bad. It could've made the difference in the election. I call it election tampering. But then, the mainstream media has been pandering to Obama and his campaign and now his presidency.

But the admission on that Sunday, which came seven months after NYT staff reporter Stephanie Strom's reporting about possibly illegal coordination between the Obama campaign and ACORN last year, took the form of a snarky column from Clark Hoyt, the Old Gray Lady's "public editor." Hoyt used the word "nonsense" to describe the allegations of impropriety leveled against ACORN and the Obama campaign.

Hoyt wrote in the Sunday New York Times

On March 17, a Republican lawyer, quoting a confidential source for a Times reporter, testified to Congress that the newspaper killed a story last fall because it would have been "a game-changer" in the presidential election.

The charge, amplified by Bill O'Reilly on Fox News in April and reverberating around the conservative blogosphere, is about the most damning allegation that can be made against a news organization. If true, it would mean that Times editors, whose job is to report the facts without fear or favor, were so lacking in integrity that they withheld an important story in order to influence the election.

I have spent several weeks looking into this issue - interviewing and e-mailing those involved, reading transcripts, looking at campaign finance records and conferring with legal experts. In a nutshell, I think the charge is nonsense.

In his very first sentence Hoyt makes a careless mistake: it was March 19, not March 17 (St. Patrick's Day), that the "Republican lawyer," Heather Heidelbaugh, testified before the House Judiciary Committee.

Then Hoyt gets caught up in minutiae, agonizing about whether the story would have been "a game-changer in the presidential election." He downplays the illegalities, calling them "technical violations of campaign finance law."

Hoyt writes:

The story involved allegations that Barack Obama's campaign, in league with Acorn, a left-leaning community activist group, was guilty of technical violations of campaign finance law. Evidence supplied by the source could not be verified. Even if the story had panned out, it is hard to see how any editor could have regarded it as momentous enough to change an election in which the Republicans were saddled with an unpopular war and an economic meltdown.

On the surface if one doesn't think through Hoyt's explanation carefully, it may seem quite reasonable. But spend a few minutes thinking about it and holes begin to appear in the house ombudsman's reasoning.

A quick digression: Of course, we can only wonder what the New York Times would have done if it had gained information that John McCain's campaign had committed technical violations of campaign finance law. The NYT did publish a blog item about the DNC's allegation that McCain's campaign had illegally procured a loan and the paper was only too willing to imply in a Feb. 21, 2008 story that McCain was having a romantic affair with a female lobbyist three decades his junior. The charge, which was based on information provided by anonymous sources supposedly working for McCain, ultimately proved groundless and the newspaper retracted it a year later. The NYT disingenuously claims that it had never intended to suggest that the lobbyist "had engaged in a romantic affair with Senator McCain."

The aborted story that gave rise to the Obama/ACORN controversy centers around information provided by Anita MonCrief, a former ACORN employee whom Hoyt acknowledges "fed information to Stephanie Strom of The Times for several articles on troubles within the group." Apparently the information MonCrief provided was good.

We know this because Strom broke a number of important stories about ACORN and surely much of the information she used came from her trusted source Anita MonCrief. In July she reported that Dale Rathke, brother of ACORN founder Wade Rathke, embezzled nearly $1 million from the group. She also reported that ACORN management covered up the embezzlement for eight years, withholding information even from ACORN's national board.

The next month Strom reported that Tides Foundation founder Drummond Pike, a comrade-in-arms of liberal philanthropist George Soros, had personally covered what remained of Wade Rathke's debt (the embezzler had agreed to a slow-as-molasses repayment plan that would have kept him in debt well into old age).

In September Strom reported on two ACORN national board members' lawsuit aimed at forcing ACORN to provide financial documents regarding the embezzlement.

She followed up the next month with a story on ACORN's efforts to sever its remaining ties with its founder. (Strom reported that Wade Rathke resigned as chief organizer of ACORN. In fact, Rathke was fired, as shown in the ACORN national board's minutes of June 20, 2008, available at page 11 of the linked PDF file.)

The same month Strom wrote about an internal memo written by ACORN's lawyer that alerted the group to potential legal problems related to its organizational structure.

But apparently MonCrief's information was suddenly no good when it might have embarrassed the Obama campaign.

Heidelbaugh testified before a congressional committee in March that the nonprofit group violated a host of tax, campaign finance, and other laws. She said the Obama campaign sent ACORN its "maxed out donor list" and asked two of the avowedly nonpartisan group's employees "to reach out to the maxed out donors and solicit donations from them for Get Out the Vote efforts to be run by ACORN."

Hoyt describes the interactions between ACORN and Democratic campaigns this way:

On Sept. 7, Moncrief wrote to Strom that she had donor lists from the campaigns of Obama and Hillary Clinton and that there had been "constant contact" between the campaigns and Project Vote, an Acorn affiliate whose tax-exempt status forbids it to engage in partisan politics. Moncrief said she had withheld that information earlier but was disclosing it now that the conservative columnist Michelle Malkin was "all over it."

Hoyt writes that Strom received from MonCrief "a spreadsheet purporting to be the Obama donor list, but there was no on-the-record source or other way to verify that the list came from the Obama campaign." MonCrief agreed to go on the record but the NYT suddenly discovered that she had "a credibility problem" because she "had been fired by Acorn for using an official credit card for personal expenses."

To repeat, although the newspaper knew of the supposed credibility problem, it found MonCrief's information highly reliable in previous ACORN articles. All of sudden MonCrief was deemed not credible on a story that might have an adverse impact on Obama's candidacy.

Hoyt wrote that Suzanne Daley, the national editor, "called a halt to Strom's pursuit of the Obama angle."

Hoyt then presents an expert opinion about how, even if true, MonCrief's allegations would not have been a game-changer for the election.

But PowerLine's John Hinderaker skillfully dissects Hoyt's sophistry, writing:

Hoyt also argues that the story about Obama and ACORN would not have been a "game-changer" in that it would not have swung the election to John McCain. I agree. But since when is that the standard? Is Hoyt telling us that the Times' policy is only to print stories that have the potential to change the result of a Presidential election? Of course, if the story did have the potential to change the outcome of the election, that, too, would have been offered as a reason not to print it.

Hinderaker also argues that "the facts as related by Hoyt don't rebut the charge; they support it."

Read Hinderaker's commentary on the case and decide for yourself if the New York Times was right to end its probe.

Read more:

Of course, we now know that ACORN was guilty of voter registration fraud in as many as 14 states, and has recently been investigated by a House of Representatives Committee and found to be guilty of Embezzelment, money laundering, Racketeering under the Federal RICO Statute, interference with a federal election, misuse of public funds, and other crimes I can't remember. But, the Obama Administration is going to pay ACORN $59 million dollars to assist with the U.S. Census. This is absolutely unheard. Obama is taking the Census away from the U.S. Department of Commerce. This is a blatant abuse of power of the executive office.

There is more I can add to this ever-growing list. The American people are waking up to the fact that they have voted a Radical Islamic Terrorist into the office of the POTUS. He wasn't vetted and it is very likely that he is not eligible to serve in that capacity. He is destroying this country. Until he shows he is eligible, he is nothing more than a half-breed, Indonesion son of a white trash whore.

There is one more interesting item I would like to add about Barrack Hussein Obama. This comes from Britain. My source is Christopher Story, who a former adviser to Lady Thatcher and has over 37 years experience of specialist intelligence. Mr. Story has testified on several occasions before U.S. Congressional Committes on International affairs issues. He is a very well-known independent currency, economics, finance and current affairs specialist. He publishes "International Currency Review" since 1969.

London, 30th January 2009:

The Obama Treasury Has Not Delivered
Although President Obama has been reported to us (repeatedly) as requiring the release of the Refunding and Settlements funds, the funding has not been released. Althought Robert Armenta and Christopher J. McCurdy, of the New York Fed were arrested as reported in the precedings analysis, and other senior people have also been arrested, the releases have not transpired.

Although Neil Bush, we now understand, obtained access to the stolen $12.8 billion and despite the fact that on 27th, 28th and 29th January we were specifically told that the same crooks were attempting to steal funds, the same crooks were attempting to steal funds, that Dr. Alan Greenspan, acting on instructions from Bush 41 and Bush 43, had been told (quote) "if you do this again you will be eliminated" (unquote) and criminal operatives inside the Treasury were (we were told) given the same warning, the main funds have not been released. Although the newly appointed US Director of National Intelligence (Admiral Blair), Office of Naval Intelligence, was reported to us to have "signed off" in accordance with President Obama's wishes, the main fundds have not been released.

*This is no surprise. Blair was at Oxford as an ONI trainee under cover as a Rhodes Scholar, at the same time as Clinton. The ONI are suspected of operating a virulent blackmail campaign against one or more highlevel personages in the United Kingdom. The Editor suspects that this fact is part of the cobweb of blackmail which the US criminal intelligence community thinks it can sustain in order to hold on to funds that have been stolen (see below) That's what it thinks.

Greenspan interferes, the stealing continues
On 28th January, notwithstanding the new broom at the White House, the arch crook Greenspan interfered with the releases as reported above, with the transaction beng stopped as a result.

The bank refused to accept the transfer and bankers on each side of the Atlantic were arrested.

As noted above, Greenspan's minions at the Treasury were given the same warning as Greenspan.

There are, broadly speaking, two main reasons why these maniacs have continued their stealing operations under the nose of the president. We understand on good authority has made his requirements on this score crystal clear.

The Fraudulent Finance criminalists have assumed that they can leverage the situation so that the derivatives Ponzi scamming operations continue as though there had been no discontinuity.

The Bush/Baker/Clinton Fraudulent Finance Nexus have colossal financial obligations that they cannot meet, so they are continuing to try to steal the funds in order (a) to meet those obligations, and (b) to annex them for use as platforms for their continued Fraudulent Finance intentions.

The President has Carefully Refrained From Mincing His Words
President Obama's public statements have explicitly indicated, in translation, that the greed of Wall Street and therefore Fraudulent Finance, and the complacency and co-conspiratorial behavior of corrupt US officials and legislators are specifically responsible for this crisis.

This crisis is a SYSTEMIC FRAUDULENT FINANCE CRISIS first and foremost. All commentary and analyses that sidestep this reality are misleading and go nowhere.

This message was repeated when the President addressed a powerful group of American businessmen on 28th January, when, illustrating that he has his priorities straight, he advised them that men and women are returning to their homes to confront their spouses with the news that they have been fired, as a specific consequence of the unfettered greed of Wall Street scamsters and plutocratic investors playingi around with speculative leveraged Fraudulent Finance transactions, and of the behavior of 'Washington'. No one except theh perpetrators and people who haven't woken up from their political prejudices dissents from this view, anywhere in the world.

The Editor has just, at ten minutes past midnight (29th/30th January) received a distressed call from a lady in California who notified him that bureaucrats in certain State of California offices are, as we speak, engaged in massive fraudulent operations in connections with foreclosures affectinig large numbers of citizens. The lady was extremely distressed, poor soul, but the Editor managed to tell her that he personally guarantees to publicize this criminality as soon as the necessary detailed information has been provided. Mr. Obama needs to know about these scams, as well.

Unfortunately, it would appear that the new president, whose words can hardly be faulted so far in the financial crisis and its causes are concerned, is being used by the familiar unscrupulous forces as a foil behind which they have intended to continue with their Fraudulent Finance ops. If this is correct, then of course, what we have here is another example of the standard modus operandi of double-mindedness: facing both ways. While the president embarks upon domestic and foreign political initiatives, the financial crooks think they can continue with their criminal operations.

But regrettably for the reprehensible serial scam artists, the prepetuators of this Grandfather of all fraud scandals have forgotten the following PERTINENT, BASIC, FACTS OF LIFE:







Since the Obama Treasury has failed to deliver and none of the assurances received have any more credibility than those promulgated by the decadent Paulson Treasury, the appropriate price for this unparralleled criminal intrasigence, which the foreign powers in question have leaned over backwards to avoid, may be paid.

A very widely promulgated assertion, believed to have been inspired by the Fraudulent specialists in the Treasury and their co-conspirators externally, that the releases will not be taking place 'until mid-February' which morphed later into 'or even later', has clearly signalled that these people have not understood anything, leading to the conclusion that they will need to be made to pay the price of their continuing defiance.

And the price will be exceedingly painful, we understand.
Now for some subsidiary FACTS which appear to have been conveniently forgotten as well:

The Reagan-Mitterand Protocol's fund amount is of the order of $270 billion

An intelligence officer who accepts a freely given loan of $35,000 plus interest for two yearas, paid to get him out of Probation in order to assist towards the resolution of these matters, but who fails to take any steps at all to pay it back not even writing a letter of intent to that effect, is not a fit person to handle vast sums of money, and could never be trusted with LOAN funds.

The LOAN funds made available by Her Majesty The Queen on behalf of The Group of Seven Financial Powers, as reconfirmed in 2007 and 2008, will not be taken into the US Treasury where they could be exploited and yet again illegally used as base for further Fraudulent Finance operations. This has been the intention, but it will not be permitted.

Separately, a few days ago, the Editor was asked: would he hold back on any further comment arising from Lord Myners' belated observation, reported in the preceding analysis, that those engaged in FRAUD in the banking sector in Britain should be prosecuted.

We were about to add that the Conservative Party leader, David Cameron, interviewed on Sky News on 26th January, elaborated:
"We need to look at the behavior of banks and bankers and where such people have behaved inappropriately that needs to be identified and if anyone has behaved criminally, in my view, there is a role for the criminal law. I don't understand why in this country the regulatory authorities seem to be doing so little to investigate it, whereas in America, they are doing quite a lot."

There followed hearings before the House of Commons Treasury Select Committee, at which the remarks purveyed for the benefit of uncomprehending MPs by a batch of Hedge Fund managers made it crystal clear that these unreformed operators have every intention of continuing their Fraudulent Finance Ponzi derivatives operations as though there has been no discontinuity.

The MPs, of course, tended not to ask the right questions.

So, THAT was the reason, then that the Editor of this service was asked not to elaborate further on the remarks attributed to Lord Myners. Memorandum to whoever issued this instruction:


THE 'NO ONE COULD HAVE PROTECTED THIS LIE and the other day, the London Evening Standard, which is being bought by the KGB/GRU officer Lebedev, a pal of Mikhail Gorbachev, carried a headline to the effect that Gordon Brown had stated that 'no one ccould have predicted what has happened.', with reference to the global financial crisis that of course, as an intelligence officer, Mr. Brown knows all about.

On 27th January, Ian Powerll, UK Chairman and Senior Partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), stated: 'Nobody could have prepared for the events we have witnessed over the last few months'.

No further comment.


The evidence shows that BHO cannot prove who he, where he was born, who his true parents are or where he lived from birth to age 11 (or maybe 13). BHO’s accounts of his college years do not line up with facts and the only real record of his attendance is the trail of 20-year-past-due parking tickets paid after he announced his candidacy to run for president—and after the Somerville News reported the delinquency.

Since he began campaigning for the Democrat nomination for president, a broad, diverse array of organizations and individuals, some of them very credible, have charged BHO with racism, lack of experience, drug use, homosexuality and ties to radical Muslims and organized crime. We can include four murders (three at his "former" church), that are directly or indirectly associated with his recent personal or political history.

The nicest thing we can say is that the Democrats must be short on quality public servants for BHO to have made the final cut as his party’s mascot for the 2008 election. The truth is likely much more sinister.

We err when assuming our leaders are chosen by us through the electoral process; the mantra that "America is the freest country in the world and anyone can be president" is not true. To the contrary, our leaders are "created" from Illuminati bloodlines and their lives are scripted through convoluted stories and false documents—all of which is facilitated by incalculable wealth and political power. Obama’s recent denunciation of public campaign funding is a sign that he intends to continue business as usual, remaining unaccountable for his perversions, his crimes and those of his cohorts.

Ask any black man or woman if they truly discern that Barack Obama is an "African-American," and they will likely tell you he is far from the norm, both in appearance and demeanor. The anger he exudes is not born of American heritage, nor of American constitutional principles. He has yet to express himself from the heart, an event which is unlikely to ever occur.

The secret operative with aspirations to lead America into an uncertain future reprimands his followers (and outside observers) like the father he never had, with disdain for our discernment, our love of country and our common sense.

As is the case with many U.S. presidential hopefuls, Barack Obama’s ties are deep, though his personal roots are shallow. This political candidate "created out of thin air" has been exposed by the light of day. Millions of us had hoped for a stiff wind to carry him off into the sunset—as quickly as he rose to his status of idolized adulation. That was the sort of change we all wanted believe in.

And there has been even more events that have unfolded since I did this research. The Healthcare Legislation that Obama and his minions is trying to force down American's throats is horrific. They are ANIMALS. If that passes, I don't know what is going to happen. But with Obama threatening Israel like he is, and stepping all over the American people and taking away their freedom. He will not finish his term. He'll be lucky to make it to Christmas. This is in no way a threat from me. It is merely an observation. One can only terrorize people so long before someone steps up and takes care of the problem. Whether it's Israel or someone else, I can't say that I would be sad.


Anonymous said...

Well, I do read your blog. And your current posting can be divided into two parts: stuff that I know about, and stuff that I don't know about. First, the first part:

Those issues that I already knew about, your statements are true and verifiable.

Now the second part:

Those issues consist of things I have already heard others mention, or some that I have never considered.

Since you do not know which things I already knew to be facts, since you don't know me from Adam, I have to consider that it is likely that much of "part two" is also true.

This is disturbing.

It would be bad enough if only one of these issues were true. And this is provably true. But since we have what is called in legal terms a "preponderance of facts", it would seem that this country has sworn in a person who is not qualified to serve, with an unknown and dubious agenda.

What's In A Name? said...

There is more that was not put into this post. I know some of my posts must come across at times, like the rantings of someone obsessed with BHO. This is not the case at all. It is deeply disturbing to me that SO MANY issues surround this man and SO MANY have turned their heads. There is evidence and it will come to light. However, finding it is dangerous and exposing it is even more dangerous.

Bloggers have been threatened. Blogs and websites have disappeared when they've gotten even close to naming names or telling what they know.

I will not quit and those who are doing what I do will not, either. The American people must know.

Meanwhile, we must fight this man and his administration at every turn. This is not a party issue. This is a fight for our country and for our souls. Dramatic? Depends on how one looks at this. I think this is a spiritual war.

Marie Devine said...

Those are a lot of charges, difficult for most of us to fully understand, and extremely unlikely to be corrected by legal means on those issues.

The main focus for us is to get him out of office and not get side-tracked with what we cannot prove.

Evidence shows Barack Obama was an Indonesian citizen in the US on a student visa even after his parents were divorced when he was over 18 years old. That is why he did not register for the selective service, he was not required to, being a foreign citizen. Then he had to create one for the campaign when questions were asked.

The charges and evidences against Barack Obama are on my website, court style:

A copy was sent to Barack Obama and US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald. Both were sent about 2-11-09. Barack Obama clearly thinks he has something to hide.

Email the president that you want this controversy ended, The president, administration and Congress, and media will only press the president to quickly end this controversy if the people press them for a quick end. He should easily be able to end this controversy with proofs he has held as hidden. The president is open for blackmail from his own administration and others who have his records: Kenya, Pakistan, Indonesia, classmates and faculty at his colleges etc. This is serious and he cannot get out without prayer.

What's In A Name? said...

I do not care to "prove" anything. What I put in my blogs are not "speculation" but are things that I have verified myself or have found myself.

I do not care if he produces a birth certificate or not. If you did read my blog carefully, you will note that I addressed the issue of the birth certificate in a round-about way. He is NOT African. His apparent genetic traits prove that to be wrong. This means he can't be eligible to be president, but what does that matter? He is in the Oval Office! And apparently, he did not get there alone. This was a "planned event" and he had plenty of help along the way. The fact that there is no documentation of who is really is should at least send a red flag up to you and others that he was "created". Barack Obama does not exist. Only on paper does he exist. If we should happen to pry him from the White House, what do you think that would accomplish? Have you even thought about this?

This would bring about great social unrest in this country, not to mention a constitutional crisis that NO ONE would be able to untangle. THAT could be THE PLAN all along. This would enable someone to institute martial law. Do you know what this would mean? This means that the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights are no more. Look it up. This should scare you. Be careful what you wish for. You just may get your wish.

When the first Iraqi war ended and we did not get Saddam Hussein, people asked, why didn't we go get Hussein? Well, my husband was privvy to many things "armed forces" shall I say. He said, "because we know that the person behind him is worse than he is, that is why...." There is and old saying, choose your battles wisely. You must win the battle to win the war. This is a series of "battles" for the American people. So far, we are losing. First, we must educate those who cannot see. Obviously you must open your eyes. See things not as you want them to be but as THEY ARE.

I have my opinions and I do blog my opinions. But in matters such as this particular blog, I write what I know, as I stated at the beginning of the post.

We need Americans to stand up for America. Those people must have faith in God and love their country. Let us not be the generation that is looked upon as the one that gave America away.